Kenn's Laws | | REAL Black History | Kenn's Essays | History & Archaeology | Weather

Why Racism is Wrong | Why White Supremacy is Wrong | Why Antisemitism Is Wrong

MUST READ ► My Horrific Experience With A Psychopath

January 21, 2016 -- Reginald Carr was 23 at the time. Jonathan was 20.

What they did was horrifying. 

The Carr brothers were convicted and sentenced to death for a seven-day string of crimes in December 2000. Most infamously, the two men invaded a home in an east-side neighborhood of Wichita. There, over the course of about three hours, they forced three men to have sex with two women. 
They compelled the two women to have sex with each other. Jonathan raped one woman and attempted to rape the other. Reginald raped one of the women.
The Carrs then drove the five victims to a soccer field and forced them to kneel in the snow. One of the Carr brothers shot each victim in the back of the head. The state never definitively established the identity of the shooter.
Killed were Jason Befort, 26; Brad Heyka, 27; Aaron Sander, 29; and Heather Muller, 25. The fifth victim survived when the bullet apparently bounced off a plastic hair clip she was wearing.  —
The crime occurred in 2000. The United States Supreme Court upheld the death penalty in the Carr brothers case in and 8-to-1 decision yesterday. It was a rare instance when conservative and liberal justices agreed. 

The sole dissenting opinion came from Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor said she did not believe the cases should have been reviewed by the Supreme Court. —

Please report typos...

▼ SHARE if you agree with the court's decision  ▼

More racist hate crime reports at [click here]

Source ►
Image credit: ####

Please do not submit comments containing obscene, racist, or otherwise offensive language. Although comments are not routinely monitored, offending comments will be summarily zapped if discovered to be unduly gauche.

Comment ▼▼▼ is a family-friendly web site.
If you see advertisements that are inappropriate, please notify us via Facebook messaging here ►

Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.

Comments at are unmoderated. Comments containing obscenities, pejoratives, slurs, etc., do not constitute an endorsement of this site, its contributors or its advertisors. Offensive comments may be deleted without notice.
Comment ▼


  1. Thank God the Carr's convictions were upheld!

    Why on earth would Soto dissent just because she didn't think the Supreme Court should have heard the case? That makes no sense at all but then I bet she's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

  2. "The Wise Latina"