Kenn's Laws | | REAL Black History | Kenn's Essays | History & Archaeology | Weather

Why Racism is Wrong | Why White Supremacy is Wrong | Why Antisemitism Is Wrong

MUST READ ► My Horrific Experience With A Psychopath

December 31, 2015 -- Nadia Murad  said she was kidnapped and raped. The 21-year-old Iraqi woman was sold as a sex slave and faced daily horrors.

The young woman spoke at Cairo University telling listeners that religious zealots entered her village and promptly murdered children, the elderly, and young men.

The young women and girls were kept alive to serve as sex slaves.

The question to ask: Which religious group committed this atrocities.

Were they:


Hint: The religion is 1,400 years old and is the world's largest and deadliest hate group.
Hint: Hillary Clinton wants to import hundreds of thousands of members of this hate group.

Please report typos...

A brave victim of Islamic State who was captured in her home and sold as a sex slave has told of the daily horrors she was subjected to.

Nadia Murad, 21, is from the northern Iraqi town of Sinjar, which is heavily populated by the Yazidi community.

Considered infidels by ISIS militants, many from the Yazidi community are stolen from their homes and told into a sex trade.

Miss Murad is one among thousands of women and children ISIS have taken and forced to become sex salves.

Speaking at Cairo University in Egypt, she told students: "When Daesh entered my village, they killed children, the old and young men.

Read more : New Year's Eve terror fears as 2,000 armed officers have leave cancelled to protect London

"The next day, they killed the old women and led the young girls, including me, to Mosul.

"In Mosul, I saw thousands of Yazidi women where they were distributed to their slave masters.

More racist hate crime reports at [click here]

Source ►
Image credit: ####

Please do not submit comments containing obscene, racist, or otherwise offensive language. Although comments are not routinely monitored, offending comments will be summarily zapped if discovered to be unduly gauche.

Comment ▼▼▼ is a family-friendly web site.
If you see advertisements that are inappropriate, please notify us via Facebook messaging here ►

Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.

Comments at are unmoderated. Comments containing obscenities, pejoratives, slurs, etc., do not constitute an endorsement of this site, its contributors or its advertisors. Offensive comments may be deleted without notice.
Comment ▼


  1. yes, but who invaded Iraq under the pretense of removing Weapons of Mass Destruction which were never found ? And for what country was the regime of Saddam Hussein smashed ?

    France ? Japan ? Botswana ? No, Israel.

    1. Come off it; to stay in power after the second invasion of Iraq Saddam Hussein signed a treaty to allow US inspections of his military facilities without restrictions, which he violated from day one. He frequently fired misses at US airplanes in the no fly zones. This went on for a very long time. The US had every right to invade and remove him from power by virtue of his repeated treaty violations alone. Get off the selective use of historical facts that make the US look bad. Iraq played games to make it appear that they were infect hiding weapons from the US.

      Remember the first invasion of Iraq was because of its invasion of Kuwait.

  2. You mean the WMD's that were viewed crossing the Syrian border in the weeks before the war, which have now been used on the public, not to mention the 100's of roadside shells which have been used on coalition forces. Oh yeah, but, better just believe what CNN tells you...

  3. To be honest, we never should've gotten involved over there back in '90-'91, or again in 2003, but the whole point of this article is that Muslims are vicious savages who need the biggest one in charge of the rest to keep them in line.