Kenn's Laws | AbateHate.com | REAL Black History | History & Archaeology | History of Racial Violence | Language Loading | About

Top 25 Conservative Websites | Top 75 Facebook Pages | Kenn Sings | Why Racism is Wrong | Why White Supremacy is Wrong |

MUST READ ► My Horrific Experience With A Psychopath

Republican candidate kicked off Twitter
after criticizing hate-group member, Ilhan Omar

February 27, 2015

DAILYKENN.com -- A judge in Canada has refused to hear a case because the woman appearing was wearing an Islamic hijab.

Rania El-Alloul was in court because her car was impounded after her son was caught driving with a suspended license.

She wanted her car back. The judge wanted her to remove her head covering, and cited court rules that prohibit inappropriate dress while appearing before a magistrate.

The voice of the judge, Eliana Marengo, can be heard on an audio recording saying, "Hats and sunglasses for example, are not allowed. And I don't see why scarves on the head would be either."

The judge also used the prohibition of religious symbols as cause to refuse the case.

El-Alloul complained that she didn't feel Canadian, but didn't seem to mind not looking like a Canadian.

Please report typos...

"When I swore by God to be a good Canadian citizen I was wearing my hijab, and the judge, I shook hands with him the same day I became Canadian. I was really very happy. But what happened in court made me feel afraid. I felt that I'm not Canadian anymore."

El-Alloul said she's speaking out because she doesn't want what happened to her to happen to any other Muslim woman.

"When she insisted I should remove my hijab, really I felt like she was talking with me as... not a human being. I don't want this thing to happen to any other lady. This is not the work of a judge. She doesn't deserve to be a judge."

Judge Marengo did not respond to CBC's request for comment.

Annie-Claude Bergeron, spokesperson for the Chief Judge of the Quebec Court, said she was aware of the case, but that it's "up to the judge to apply or interpret the law the way they see it."

Regulations make no reference to headscarves

During the proceeding, Judge Marengo cited Article 13 of the regulations of the Court of Quebec. That article states: "Any person appearing before the court must be suitably dressed."

Article 13 makes no specific reference to headscarves or any other garments.

Sameer Zuberi is a board member with the Canadian Muslim Forum and a graduate of the law program at l'Université du Québec à Montréal. He says he's flabbergasted.

Source ►
Image credit: msn.com ####

DailyKenn.com is a family-friendly web site.
If you see advertisements that are inappropriate, please notify us via Facebook messaging here ►

Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting DailyKenn.com as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at DailyKenn.com are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.

Comments at DailyKenn.com are unmoderated. Comments containing obscenities, pejoratives, slurs, etc., do not constitute an endorsement of this site, its contributors or its advertisors. Offensive comments may be deleted without notice.


  1. Respect the laws of the land you live in.

  2. Respect the laws of the land you live in and don't bring your cultures out of your homes. Why did you move if you're not willing to assimilate? It sounds like you'd be happier back where you came from.

    1. No, like all of them, she'd be happier enjoying the material benefits and freedoms unique to our western societies while shoving her culture down our throats and doing the best she can to turn our country into the same hellhole she crawled out of. They're insane.


powered by Surfing Waves