s



Kenn's Laws | AbateHate.com | REAL Black History | History & Archaeology | History of Racial Violence | Language Loading | About

Top 25 Conservative Websites | Top 75 Facebook Pages | Kenn Sings | Why Racism is Wrong | Why White Supremacy is Wrong |

MUST READ ► My Horrific Experience With A Psychopath



Why are "feminists" in Sweden
afraid to speak out?



January 30, 2014

Protecting the sensitivities of black males is the
latest effort to impute black failure on white Americans
by applying the doctrine of 'disparate impact'.
When searching for the thug who just raped a woman on the University of Minnesota campus, the most urgent priority is to protect the sensitivities of black males whose self esteem may be damaged if the public knows the suspect is black.

It's the latest attempt to impose the 'disparate impact' argument. (Google it.) Damaged self esteem can lead to future failures, including the ability to earn income, the argument contends, and is therefore a violation of civil rights.

A group of organizations sent a letter to University President Eric Kaler and Pamela Wheelock, the vice president of University Services.

The letter affirmed that safety was important, but that "racial profiling is proven to inflict negative psychological effects on its victims."

Describing a suspect by gender could also lead to esteem impairment of males or indirectly stereotype women as being non-aggressive and, therefore, less qualified for certain careers option such as the military. The group, however, failed to demand a gender-neutral description of crime suspects.

Earlier this month the Dept of Education in conjunction with the Dept of Justice sent a letter to the nation's school districts citing 'disparate impact' as cause not to  discipline black students disproportionately to non-protected people groups, even when no bias is intended and without consideration to the actual disparity of rules violations by black students. Failure to comply, the letter said, constituted a violation of federal civil rights laws.



‘U’ Students Want Crime Alerts To Avoid Using Racial Descriptions

Edgar Linares / CBS Minnesota

School officials at the University of Minnesota are working with black student and facility organizations after they wrote a letter to the school’s president about the racial descriptions given in crime alerts.

The letter, sent on Dec. 6, 2013, was issued by members of the African American and African Studies, Black Faculty and Staff Association, Black Graduate and Professional Student Association, Black Men’s Forum, Black Student Union and Huntley House for African American Males.

It was directed to University President Eric Kaler and Pamela Wheelock, the vice president of University Services.

Students and staff mailed the letter more than a month after the campus went on lockdown because of an attempted robbery at Anderson Hall on Nov. 11, 2013. University of Minnesota Police wrongfully identified a student as the suspect.

On Tuesday, school officials reported there have been 25 robberies in and around the University, an increase of 27 percent over the last few years.

The organizations wrote that while campus safety is crucial, the profiling can be devastating for black male students.

“[We] unanimously agree that campus safety should be of the UMPD’s utmost importance; however, efforts to reduce crime should never be at the expense of our Black men, or any specific group of people likely to be targeted. In addition to causing Black men to feel unsafe and distrusted, racial profiling is proven to inflict negative psychological effects on its victims.”

At Wednesday’s forum, Ian Taylor Jr., president of the Black Men’s Forum, said members of his organization feel threatened when the use of a racial description is given in the crime alerts.

“The repeated black, black, black suspect,” Taylor said. “And what that does it really discomforts the mental and physical comfort for students on campus because they feel like suspicions begin to increase.”

The letter then gave 12 recommendations to UMPD Chief Gregory Hestness on how to improve their response.

The recommendations include requiring officers to attend diversity training, and attach a link on crime alerts to the U’s no-tolerance policy on racial profiling.

On Jan. 27, 2014, a formal letter was issued by Wheelock.

“I am concerned that members of your organizations and others in the University community believe there to be an increase in racial profiling,” Wheelock said. “As I stated earlier profiling will not be tolerated on campus. If there is a concern or complaint about University police practices, both Chief Hestness and I are committed to investigating the matter promptly and thoroughly.”

She did disagree with the organizations when it comes to excluding racial descriptions in the alerts.


Continue reading ►

Send no money. I don't take cash from readers. But you CAN help me help me when you  LIKE DailyKenn.com on Facebook. Click the  below.




Please report errors
Like this story?
Help Kenn spread the word by clicking it onto Facebook. See icon below . . .

Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting DailyKenn.com as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at DailyKenn.com are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.

COMMENTS: The use of vulgarities and pejoratives may result in your comment being zapped.

3 comments:

  1. As an ugly person, I demand that all facial descriptions be eliminated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bull Pucky! And that is as nice as I can be with my remarks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm bald so I demand all bald people committing crimes to be reported as having a full head of hair.

    ReplyDelete





















powered by Surfing Waves