Environmental concerns often tops the list.
Consider, for example, regulations that require a permit for photographing nature on federally owned park land.
Ostensibly the rules apply only to photographers with a profit motive. That is, professionals, such as news crews or those who plan to market their snapshots on the Internet risk being fined $1,000. Wedding photographers could unwittingly wind up in jail if they fail to obtain a $1,500 permit before venturing onto scenic grounds.
• Probable cause
Who's to say the motive behind a guy with an iPod?
Does the regulation gives park police probable cause to confiscate camcorders from tourists?
The excuse provided by a Forest Service spokesperson claims the law protects the wilderness from being exploited by photographers.
Seems to me photographers are being exploited by the Forest Service.
• Slippery slope
If the government can successfully limit our liberties to record in public parks, what's next? Will the government broaden the regulation to include all public spaces, including roads? Will recording a traffic stop become probable cause? What about dash cams on vehicles?
I know of no one who wants to see our wilderness turned into shopping malls or smoke-spewing factories. It is that consensus that is exploited by the government to impede upon our liberties.
• Wherever there is air
The Environmental Protection Agency, for example, has cracked down on wood-burning stoves using environmental concerns as an excuse. In reality, the government wants to keep us on the grid and within their scope and control. Likewise, water on any property -- including a puddle in your driveway -- can give the feds an excuse to invade your private home. After all, a drop of oil in a puddle could find its way downstream and cause untold damage to the pristine environment.
In short, wherever there is air there is the prospect for government regulation and probable cause using environmental protect as the excuse.
From our news source we read:
The U.S. Forest Service has put forward a ridiculous new set of rules which includes a mandatory permit for taking pictures of federally owned park land for commercial or professional purposes. The permit would cost roughly $1,500 and photographers who are caught taking pictures without a permit will be fined up to $1,000.Continue reading ►
Liz Close, a spokesperson for the Forest Service, says that the laws are intended to “preserve the untamed character of the country’s wilderness”, whatever that means. According to the agency, these laws were created to protect the environment and prevent areas of wilderness from being “exploited” by photographers.
Close argued that the regulation has been in place for the past four years, but it has been largely unenforced. Close was not even sure if there was anyone on the books who has actually applied for a permit over the past few years.
In 2010, the Forest Service attempted to use these rules to prevent an Idaho Public Television crew from entering federal park land to film student conservation workers. However, this created such a controversy that the agency was forced to allow the filming to take place.
Gregg Leslie, the legal defense director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in Alexandria, Va. says that these permit laws could be used to discourage journalists from covering certain topics or gaining access to certain areas.
“It’s pretty clearly unconstitutional, they would have to show an important need to justify these limits, and they just can’t,” he said.
Join Us On Facebook
Send no money. I don't take cash from readers. But you CAN help me help me when you LIKE DailyKenn.com on Facebook. Click the ✓ below.
[ DailyKenn.com ► ]
Please report errors
Like this story?
Help Kenn spread the word by clicking it onto Facebook. See icon below . . .
Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting DailyKenn.com as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at DailyKenn.com are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.
COMMENTS: The use of vulgarities and pejoratives may result in your comment being zapped.