Kenn's Laws | AbateTheHate.com | AlienCrime.com | REAL Black History | Kenn's Essays | KennTV | Memes | History & Archaeology | Weather

Why Racism is Wrong | Fatal Flaws of White Nationalism | Why White Supremacy is Wrong | Why Antisemitism Is Dumb

March 29, 2014

By DailyKenn.com

Racism, by my definition, is disliking someone because of their biological ethnic heritage. Racism is both idiotic and immoral. Disliking others due to unchangeable biological characteristics is nonsensical, defies reason, and is void of any moral value.

Sadly, there are those who subscribe to such nonsense. Personally, I could care less who lives in my neighborhood, providing they keep their kittens out of my fish pond and their teenagers from attacking people after dark, organizing themselves in violent flash mobs, or murdering 12-year-old girls so they can steal their bikes.

Sadder, still, is the fact that others attempt to erase racism by pretending the biological reality of races is nonexistent.


While it is immoral and idiotic to dislike others due to their biological ethnic heritage, it is also immoral and idiotic to bury one's head in the sands of political correctness and deny races exist.


• The concept of racism

The concept of racism first emerged as a Marxist agitation ploy to create friction between classes of people. It is that cultural disruption that allows the political and economic left to gain and retain control as the victims (proletariat) of racism are dependent upon government to fend off the privileged villainous racists (bourgeois).

Magnus Hirschfeld first coined the
terms racist and racism in the 1930s
The noun racist was first introduced by Magnus Hirschfeld in his book Racism, a 1938 English translation of an earlier work in Hirschfield's native German. The original German transcript was written in 1933 and 1934.

In 1933 Hirschfeld fled to France, not because of his Jewish heritage, but because the National Socialists closed his Institute of Sexual Science. Hirschfeld's primary area of research was sexology, a topic over which he obsessed challenging even the passion of Alfred Kinsey.

Hirschfeld was sometimes correct, as cultural Marxism typically exploits bits of truth then falsely extrapolates it into nonsensical, ideological kudzu. Hirschfeld noted, for example, that interbreeding was possible between races, then concluded that races are mental abstracts or social constructs, all the while ignoring the myriad of biological markers that Hirschfeld, being a medical professional, surely knew existed.

Hirschfeld extended his ideology to the condemnation of Zionism as ethnocentric, in spite of the fact that he was a Jew. He also extolled individualism as the criteria by which one's merit should be acknowledged -- something similar to Martin Luther King's content of character concept. Who could argue with that? In the end he identified seventy individuals he considered outstanding world figures, explained Sam Francis. All but eight or nine of those on the list, it turns out, were white Europeans. None were black.

Who was he fooling?

Thus the individual who gave us the terms racist and racism was an intellectually dishonest, albeit brilliant, leftist with an agenda. Take note that prior to Hirschfeld the social concept of racism didn't exist. Humans simply took note of what they observed and believed their eyes.

We still do, of course. Show anyone a photograph and ask them to describe the hat worn by the black man in the crowd and they will innately do so. None will say, "There is no black guy. Race is a social construct."

Cultural Marxism is burdened, therefore, with the task of convincing white people that their acknowledgement of race realism is racist and, all the while, denying that race exists.


• Exploiting race to advance an agenda

Cultural Marxism perennially pretends to fight racism even as it proliferates it.

Two things of which to take note:

Note, first, that Jesse Jackson is a perennial opponent of white racism. Then ponder what Rev. Jackson would do for a living if there were no racism? If the exterminator exterminated all the vermin, he'd be out of a job. Jackson needs racism like the Orkin man needs rats.

Note, second, that there are cultures that are practically void of racism. These homogeneous cultures include Iceland, The Falklands, The Isle of Man, and Cameroon. Were cultural Marxism truly determined to wipe out racism, it would struggle to create racially segregated, homogeneous cultures. But that's not what we see. Rather, we observe cultural Marxism successfully creating heterogeneous cultures in which racial conflict is bound to happen. It weaves ethnicity into the cultural fabric through integration to assure the friction can be neither avoided nor resolved. Like Jesse Jackson and other exterminators, it is guaranteed a "job."

Here's a question to ponder: What's more dishonest than an exterminator who breeds rats?
HUD wants to make the Rural Purge reality.

Recently The Department of Housing and Urban Development announced plans to force integration upon every outpost of white homogeneous communities. Ostensibly its agents want to fight the evils of segregation which, through their filtered thinking, translates into racism and the consequential economic and social injustices it causes. In reality it wants to exacerbate racial and ethnic tensions, assuring that agitation will be be well-woven into our culture from Manhatten, New York to Mayberry, RFD.

Again, the struggle against racism is perennial because cultural Marxism requires it to survive. While white people allow themselves to be guilt ridden for even entertaining the thought that the crowd of obnoxious young black thugs may pose physical danger, non-whites are encouraged to embrace the ethnocentric perspective that even Hirschfeld deplored.

Here's a meme to remember: Government-forced integration breeds racism.

Neither integration nor segregation constitutes or causes racism. Rather, racism is the outcome of government force. Government's role is to protect our freedom of association; not to remove it.


• Four pillars of culture

So we make concessions to purge our culture of the evils of racism even as non-whites are encouraged to do the opposite. This process of cultural mitigation deprives the white bourgeois (Marxist perspective) of control while empowering the non-white proletariat. Neither diversity nor multiculturalism is a strength. That is precisely why cultural Marxism flames it's fire.

There are at least four pillars of a cultural structure that must be compromised for Marxism to thrive.


• The first is a unified language.

When my French ancestors first set foot in the British colonies they were challenged with adopting English so they could adapt to the culture. 100 years later, when the colonists sought independence from British oppression, they began making linguistic distinctions between themselves and the enemy. The letter u took a noticeable hit as labour became labor, colour became color, and our neighbours became our neighbors. Coincidentally, the British spellings were remnants of the Norman invasion hundreds of years earlier.

Nous les Gens
Today American culture is being fractured as we are annoyed by the requirement to dial "1" for English, listen to Spanish announcements over the public address systems, and surf past Spanish cable channels.

The United States Constitution was written in English. There was no anticipation of a fractured culture.

The natural divide between us and them is, again, by design. The left causes racial divisions for exploitation purposes as it encourages a sense of victimization among the non-white proletariat and guilt among the privileged white bourgeois.

Cultural Marxism, therefore, is innately racist even as it accuses those of us who resist such efforts of being the same. It is akin to a schoolyard bully accusing his victims of being bullies.


• The second pillar is a sense of history.

Again, from an ounce of truth grows disinformation and misinformation in kudzu proportions.

Good or evil?
Here's one example.

The Trail of Tears is an historical reality, although the Indians whose trek to the West was made aboard boats shed few tears. We all know that Indians perished along the trail. We do not consider that Indians perished who did not make the trek. The dirty little secret is that every single Indian alive in 1830 is now dead and would have died with or without the transfer to homogeneous homelands. Who knows that many Indians acclimated themselves to Western culture and were exempted from the move? Does anyone stop to consider that some of the Indians who made the trek were quite wealthy? Are we informed that the government provided healthcare to the Indians as they made their way westward? Does cultural Marxism ever take note that millenia of inter-tribal warfare was ended by white people? Or do we take note that white innovation, particularly in the healthcare field, has saved millions of lives of Indians and other non-whites? Why is cultural Marxism so eager to portray white people as instigators of genocide when, in reality, our innovation has enhanced living standards of the billions of humans who co-occupy the planet and will continue to do so for generations to come?

Cultural Marxism seeks to cast a disparaging shadow across American history, forever portraying white people as slavers while ignoring the reality that we ended millenia of legal chattel slavery worldwide. They question the moral content of the minds of our founders, but only when convenient. Sordid tales of Christians on deadly witch hunts are well known to every school child even as they are simultaneously taught that America was founded as a secular nation. Does no one else see they hypocrisy? How do revisionists convince us that slavery was an institution embraced by our Christian founders, and then contend that our founders were deists and not Christians?

Christopher Columbus opened a door to the new world that culminated in remarkable innovative changes that will continue to enhance the lives of the descendants of natives for generations. Cultural Marxism rewrites history to focus on viral epidemics that killed Indians. Of course, they never mention that the critters that introduced the Black Death to Europe were imported from China, nor do they bother to mention the body of evidence pointing to syphilis as being as native to the Americas as maze and tobacco.

In the cultural Marxism narrative, white people have a history of oppressing non-whites.


• The third pillar is comprised of icons and symbols.

Icons are powerful. They instill a sense of community and identity. People literally give their lives in honor of icons in the form of symbols and flags.

The Roman Emperor Constantine understood this principle when he went to battle Maxentius. According to the historian Lactantius, Constantine ordered each shield held by every soldier to include the image of the cross. Constantine knew, no doubt, that the enemy's army included a large contingency of Christians who would be reluctant to pierce the cross with an arrow, spear, or sword.

Traditional American icons are demonized, removed, and replaced. Most notorious is the Confederate flag. In my lifetime I have watched that flag change from a benign symbol of Southern culture to be demonized as the embodiment of racial hatred. Statues of Confederate statesman are removed. Today's monuments are erected en masse to honor Rosa Parks and Martin Lutheran King, Jr.

How peculiar that multiculturalism excludes Southern culture.

The demonization of Paula Deen had nothing to do with her use of the n word. Deen was an icon. Her cooking show placed a positive spin on Southern white culture. And that, to cultural Marxism, in anathema.
Where have all the icons gone?

So it was that from 1969 to 1972 Americans were denied television programming that portrayed their culture in a positive light. Called the rural purge, white-friendly programming such as The Andy Griffith Show, The Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, Mister Ed, Petticoat Junction, Hee Haw, and Lassie were stripped from the weekly lineup. Many of those programs were immensely popular and profitable. They were also anathema to cultural Marxism that requires white America to be demonized. During that same time frame America was introduced to a slew of commercials feature black actors. Next up was Norman Lear and his onslaught of politically correct humor.

Television programming is iconic and such icons from Ellie Mae Clampett to Paula Deen's kitchen are untenable.

The image of Christopher Columbus is no longer honored. Streets and public places named after America's founders have long gone out of vogue.


• The fourth pillar is common identity.

We are even deprived of such friendly icons such as manger scenes.

The American colonies were founded along religious lines. As long as the colonists feuded over Calvinism and other such Christian notions, a unified Republic would never occur. Fortunately the foot of Roger Williams set upon on the shores of Massachusetts. The audacious but brilliant Williams found himself at odds with the Puritan leaders and, consequently, given the proverbial boot. It was in Rhode Island, a colony largely of Williams' making, that the concept of religious liberty was not only conceived, but birthed. Christians of various stripes and colors were allowed seats at the round table. The colonists warmed to the notion and, in time, Baptist churches were built blocks away from Presbyterians and few cared, as long as there was whiskey in the cupboard.

Americans were not communal, but they had much in common: A common religion, a common language, and a common rule of law. Combined those elements comprised to create a common people whose cohesion could withstand an onslaught from the British Empire. Add a common work ethic to a lust for liberty and America with her European cousins transformed humanity with previously unfathomable innovation.

What made America work was a common identity.


• Summary conclusion

Today our identity is being fractured by design. Beginning in 1965 our government displaced the European criteria for immigration and opened our borders to huddled masses who yearned, not to be free, to exploit our heritage. Some assimilated, most did not.

The same is true in Europe and Australia.

In time our common culture will be gone and, along with it the innovative infrastructure that feeds, finances, and provides healthcare to all humanity. An impending dark ages looms on the horizon from which humanity will never recover and we're witnessing the storm front in our life time. We the people who enhance the lives of all others are being destroyed. And that, my friend, is racism: The destruction of one race of people to the detriment of all others.

Summarily, when cultural Marxism says it hates racism, it is saying it hates me. When I say I hate racism, I'm saying I hate cultural Marxism and the irreversible damage it is doing to all people of all races.



 

Send no money. I don't take cash from readers. But you CAN help me help me when you  LIKE DailyKenn.com on Facebook. Click the  below.




Please report errors
Like this story?
Help Kenn spread the word by clicking it onto Facebook. See icon below . . .

Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting DailyKenn.com as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at DailyKenn.com are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.

COMMENTS: The use of vulgarities and pejoratives may result in your comment being zapped.

20 comments:

  1. Excellent and highly informative. Worth referencing time and again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. DK - You do a lot of intelligent, highly thoughtful and thought provoking work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you are against "racism," then you are an anti-racist. If you are such an anti-racist, then why do you spend so much energy pointing to and maligning a specific race? In that aspect, there is zero difference between what you do and what the media does when it attempts to shape perception of facts and truths by omitting the stories that don't benefit their specific narrative and agenda. Personally, I DO care who lives in my neighborhood, because I recognize that a more racially homogenous community and society has a better shot at giving its citizens less friction, which has a greater chance to give them much more safe and productive lives. Religion and the vast array of social issues that can cause friction pale in comparison to the divisions that arise from a melting pot of races trying to coexist in the same society. Race-ism is nothing more than an active response to this reality and to the passive rhetoric of this so-called Race Realism that many people hide behind. Remove Marxism and "The Left" and you still have a gigantic biological/sociological hurdle that makes it practically impossible to have multiple races coexist in the same society without one overtaking(destroying) the other or both amalgamating into a muddled mess that surrenders many of the unique qualities that once defined them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said. 'Racism' is nothing more than the preference of one race (normally one's own) over other races. It's merely a preference. Nothing more. And it's instinctive, like the love of a mother for her offspring.

      Racial preferences needn't cause hatred or war. That concept is a (Jewish) left wing myth. I have many preferences. I happen, for instance, to prefer the company of attractive and smart people over ugly and stupid ones. And I'm not alone in this preference. This doesn't mean I'm out hunting down unattractive or dull people. I simply avoid them.

      Racism--like nationalism (which came later)--is normal and widespread throughout human history. In fact, even 'nationalism' was initially an expression of racial (and cultural and linguistic and religious) solidarity within a given area. Early nationalism generally advanced homogeneity and, like racism, was exclusive. This innate 'preference' to mix with people most like oneself is 100% normal and appropriate. These natural tendencies can be seen among other primates and in most other animal species. Kinship (racism) is ubiquitous. Animals naturally protect their own offspring just as some social primates protect their clan (and their DNA).

      There needn't be any hatred whatsoever in racism. The 'racism = hatred' view is a Jewish invention. And it has served the Jews very well. They keep their tribal racism secret, but it's there.

      Today's mega-sized, multi-racial empires (the US, for instance) are a biological abomination. They are therefore a political abomination. None will last. And it is 'nationalism'--not racism'--that is responsible for the vast majority of deaths via war that have occurred over the past 100 years. So beware of aggressive and ideological nationalism! It is a fraud. But protect your kin. And don't let Jews orchestrate the destruction of the white race while they (secretly) advance their own genetic interests. This is their diabolical plan.

      Delete
    2. 8 3 15 how BLM is like the KKK
      Each group was born out of frustration, hate and ignorance
      Neither group cares about anybody but the people in their own group
      Both groups suffer from an exaggerated sense of self-importance
      Neither group cares about the devastation and wreckage it causes in the lives of its victims
      Both groups mistakenly believe they have taken the moral high ground
      Neither group will ever admit they were wrong. Even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
      Both groups are run by a bunch of self important, egotistical want to be intellectuals
      Neither group understands why they're always under attack
      Both groups really believe that deep down inside everybody loves them. Which is why they could never do anything wrong.
      Neither group believes historical or logical evidence that contradicts their basic tenents
      Both groups believe that they speak for the entire race they claim to represent
      Neither group feels they should be held accountable for their actions
      Both group's members see racism wherever they go. Even when there is none.
      Neither group can find data to justify their cause, so they skew the existing data. Using only the parts of the raw data that will back up their claim.
      Both groups tell their members to throw temper tantrums if things don't go their way. On this scale a temper tantrum involves riots and looting
      This list is a work in progress. The KKK history is well known. The BLM is still writing their history. As its history parallels the KKK, we will be sure to document the details.

      Delete
  4. ARABS & NEGROS
    PART 2

    "Therefore, negroes are submissive to slavery, because they have little that is essentially Human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated." - Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah

    "The negroes are ugly and misshapen, because they live in a hot country." - Ibn Qutayba (828-89 A.D.)

    "Beyond known species of black West Africa to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only negroes who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered Human beings." - Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah

    "A man of discernment said: The people of Iraq do not produce something fecal such as that dropped from the wombs of the female negro. They are overdone in the womb until they are burned, so that their offspring come out something black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions, typical of negroes, the Ethiopians, and other creratures that resemble them." - Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadani, Mukhtasar Kitab al-Buldan

    "In both Arab and Iranian Islamic writings, negro blacks are described as stupid, untruthful, vicious, sexually unbridled, ugly and distorted, excessively merry, and easily affected by food and drink." - Minoo Southgate, "Negative Images of Negroes in Medieval Iranian Writings," Iranian Studies 17 (1984): p.10

    "The geographer al-Idrisi ascribes 'lack of knowledge and defective minds' to the negroes. Their ignorance, he says, is notorious; learning and distinction are almost unknown among them, and their kings only acquire what they know about government and justice from the instruction of learned Human visitors from farther north." - Bernard Lewis, Race and Slavery in the Middle East, 1990

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pip, fascinating quotes. I missed Part 1. Can you repost?

      Delete
  5. Disliking others due to unchangeable biological characteristics is nonsensical, defies reason, and is void of any moral value.

    I read this kind of nonsense all the time.

    I hate flies because of their unchangeable biological characteristics. It's not a moral judgment.

    I have the same attitude to negroes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, and I don't find anything idiotic about disliking people who have small frontal lobes, and high testosterone levels. Race exists and being apart from agressive people is a survival tactic used by people who are well in the mind, NOT idiotic.

      Delete
    2. The heck? Science from the 1800's, anyone?

      Delete
  6. "While it is immoral and idiotic to dislike others due to their biological ethnic heritage, it is also immoral and idiotic to bury one's head in the sands of political correctness and deny races exist"

    The problem with the first part of your statement, Kenn, is that you are incorrectly framing the racialist argument: a raciailst doesn't "dislike" those of another race, they want to be separated from them. Just like Islam and Christianity cannot coexist, whites and other superior cultures cannot coexist with blacks. If I could wave a magic wand and have only the "talented tenth" be the ones to live with whites, I would consent. The problem is that there are a disproportionate number of "bad" blacks versus the "good" blacks, and there is no profit in it to even try. You cannot efficiently even BEGIN to sort out the little wheat from the massive amount of chaff. So, throwing the baby out with the bathwater is the ONLY THING YOU CAN DO..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you anonymous for pointing out the fallacy of this blog. Can't say it any better. Unfortunately, because it sounds intelligent and is very well written, it appeals to people like my wife who is assured that she is not racist while wanting to be separated from people that aren't really "inferior", but whom she expects to do bad things all the time and therefore fears, wants them to "go back to Africa", etc.

      Delete
    2. Don't put your wife or family in jeopardy due to your beliefs. Let them live, at least she can get a life insurance payout when your morals backfire. Besides you'll probably divorce due to your incompatibility.

      Delete
    3. A key thought was said in the last sentence of this post, "when cultural Marxism says it hates racism, it is saying it hates me. . ." The only thing I hear from those who oppose the thoughts in this post or others are character attacks and claims of supposed fallacies. If there are fallacies, I'd like to hear them, but from my albeit rather enlightened perspective, I see no chance of it being far off. Also, I would dare you to come up with more than spelling errors!

      It is common for even cultural Marxists to agree on things that only the Africans can say without being racist (like higher crime rates of African Americans, and the disparity in interracial crime stats), but disagree on the obvious conclusion that the black and white races need to be separated for the sake of the less aggressive one.

      Randommind, you say your wife wants you to separate from people (that aren't really "inferior", but) whom she expects to do bad things all the time and therefore fears? And she wants them to "go back to Africa", etc., yet you seem to miss that the reason for the fears are completely legitimate! The fear is from knowledge, stats and likely experience!

      What part of your brain seeks to dispel that logical and significant fear with wishful thinking? Is it a delusional part perhaps. . .maybe the "God spot", responsible for illogical belief systems, as it shuts down the brain for higher thinking. Sadly it sounds as if you are willing to suffer for your faith and willing to ruin your life for this belief system, as few wives could tolerate such shaming and obvious distrust.

      If she says she is not a racist, she isn't, period. If you think she is, your definition is different, and must be somehow not meaning she is a terrible person for understanding the facts found in every aspect of the negro race. I am guessing you know the truth, but are fighting reality, believing nice people wouldn't think such things. Hate to break it to you buddy, but you have been listening to half truths and shaming, and now you are the one perpetrating them. As stated in the post above, "cultural Marxism typically exploits bits of truth then falsely extrapolates it into nonsensical, ideological kudzu."

      As the commentator above also noted, your ideology will fail (it has thousands of years and counting) it's just a question of how many people will you hurt before you realize it? You are putting your family in jeopardy by your beliefs alone. . .is your religion worth your family's unity and safety?

      Delete
  7. I believe the tide is turning! Until recently OPEN discussions such as these were impossible - with publishers refusing physically and electronically to include the ....... N-word.
    The simple truth is that the average non-white is mentally inferior to the average white.
    Beyond that is the bio-natural genetic preference for your own kind.
    Africans ARE different. There is an idiotic claim being heavily promoted that ALL races came out of Africa.
    Humans developed all over the planet ( by seeding/gods design whatever) and some developed, some didn't due to environmental challenges.
    Just as the crocodile didn't evolve past a point, neither did the Black-African. There was no need.
    The other races didn't come out of Africa, the Africans were left behind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Left behind? No, your wrong, All we wanted was a peaceful life. A life worth living, What better way is there then to stay and not evolve? Of course we would have diseases,That comes whit the package of not evolving, I got to admit, Sense we didn't Evolve like the rest, We slowly evolved later on into a Working Bee, We can stay up more then a white, Work Faster, Run, Jump, Lift weights, And not gain weight, The perfect Working Bee, We were tools to the white, We helped them, They gave nothing back except food and clothing, We could call that a peaceful life, Even the racist masters gave there slaves Days off, They dont want to overwork there Working Bee's. We can be turned into a killing machine, Probably the ultimate soildier, I mean Theres ton's of us, Someone could just Brain-wash the whole entire Black Population and turn them into Ruthless Machines.... Too bad Hitler didn't think of that. A Expandable Force, Would of crushed The U.S, Russia and brit, But that's how history was made. This is all my option :)

      Delete
    2. How is it that you said exactly what is happening, but have no clue?! Cultural Marxism HAS brainwashed blacks, and turned them into killing machines! There was a time when they were content to work and do the menial stuff they were only able to do. They did not aspire to do the great things, get an education, or rule themselves. Whites were the gods to them, just as in the more pure parts of Africa to this day. A sad thing started happening though. . .mixing. With this mixing, confusion. Suddenly we had weak and smart blacks, who did not fit in with those of their own color. . .so they got put in the masters house as a trusted servant. Then they were educated. Then they got freedom, and the vote, etc. but the only ones who could handle those rights were still the mixed smart ones. To put everyone in the same category just makes for comparisons and jealousies. It is really sad, because I believe this is the cause of black on black crime, which is like a war in our own land! All the war in the middle east, for 50 years hardly compares to the casualties of black on black crime for one year!

      Delete
  8. 8 3 15 how BLM is like the KKK
    Each group was born out of frustration, hate and ignorance
    Neither group cares about anybody but the people in their own group
    Both groups suffer from an exaggerated sense of self-importance
    Neither group cares about the devastation and wreckage it causes in the lives of its victims
    Both groups mistakenly believe they have taken the moral high ground
    Neither group will ever admit they were wrong. Even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
    Both groups are run by a bunch of self important, egotistical want to be intellectuals
    Neither group understands why they're always under attack
    Both groups really believe that deep down inside everybody loves them. Which is why they could never do anything wrong.
    Neither group believes historical or logical evidence that contradicts their basic tenents
    Both groups believe that they speak for the entire race they claim to represent
    Neither group feels they should be held accountable for their actions
    Both group's members see racism wherever they go. Even when there is none.
    Neither group can find data to justify their cause, so they skew the existing data. Using only the parts of the raw data that will back up their claim.
    Both groups tell their members to throw temper tantrums if things don't go their way. On this scale a temper tantrum involves riots and looting
    This list is a work in progress. The KKK history is well known. The BLM is still writing their history. As its history parallels the KKK, we will be sure to document the details.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You speak from the perspective of a black person, who projects and distrusts the white race as being just like the black race, based on pure propaganda, that has no evidence to back it up. The problem is, the evidence is clear on the side of the whites that they do care about others. . .in fact to a pathological level. Pathological Altruism is a white trait, and it hurts many dark nations by helping the weakest survive and reproduce like rabbits, instead of evolve through selection. We can't stand to see suffereng, due to our high empathy.

      Empathy, trust and morality stem from levels of oxytocin, and there are racially very different levels of it.

      Similar studies have been done with testosterone, which takes away control over aggression, having a "temper tantrum", promiscuity, while adding distrust, arrogance, selfishness and the tendency to want revenge. Blacks not only show higher test levels, but it is evidenced in physical characteristics like the size of their jaw, harder bones, larger male parts, etc.

      What these two hormones prove (being completely hereditary) is that whites have always been moral and kind to all species, unless it comes down to a question of defending their own, or surviving. . .while blacks attack unprovoked due to selfishness, aggression, distrust, and no empathy.

      You are right that both races believe the other loves them though. . .one out of arrogance that is illogical, considering what they give the world, and one out of wishful trust believing the world will act in empathy, following the golden rule toward the race that has advanced and given them so much. News flash, blacks as a whole do not appreciate the help, but bite the very hand that feeds them! I will not speak for their entire race, because they are so mixed with European blood, that some are more white in actions than black. . .and likewise for the white race. (The few who are mixed though are in redneck areas apparently according to DNA companies.) So I will not speak for them either.

      All I know is, the pure in the earth, being whites, are desperate to stay pure and mixed people and liberals need to stop forced integration out of empathy, or they will find the dumbing down, and immoral actions of the country as a direct result of the mixing.

      Delete
  9. A preference for one's own race is natural and human and recognized as such everywhere in the world among all races and cultures except for the culturally and racially suicidal white race. The modern world would not exist if not for white people. It is part of our Western heritage and it is natural and good. No other race or culture has done as much to advance the condition of man out of poverty and into a condition of relative comfort. And yet we berate ourselves for being white and import hoards of third-world poor and cultural backwaters in order to dilute, destroy and eliminate our race and culture. We are lemmings, or at least anyone who thinks we are all equal is a lemming. I am happy to be white and proud of it.

    ReplyDelete