|Hitler-era Germans inherited gun laws from Hitler's|
predecessor. These laws were relaxed by
The German Weapons Law of 1938.
Advocates of Second Amendment rights are often tricked into using the "Hitler's gun grab" argument, then embarrassed and discredited when they are told that Hitler actually liberalized Germany's gun laws.
Below is 'ammunition' you need to avoid that pitfall.
• Hitler's gun restrictions
Although Hitler was adamant in opposing gun ownership by conquered peoples, his government slightly liberalized gun laws inherited from his predecessors.
Those laws were enacted in 1928, five years before Hitler assumed control of Germany. They restricted ownership to responsible citizens who could prove a reason to own firearms. Hitler actually lowered the age threshold of gun ownership from 20 to 18 and further liberalized gun ownership by revoking the necessity for registering long guns. Muzzle-loaded hand guns were also exempt from registration. Hitler's government further extended gun permit validations from one year to three. It also removed restrictions on the number of firearms and ammunition an individual could own.
Hitlers government also lightened gun laws by removing the requirement to obtain a permit to purchase handguns by individuals who held a gun-owners permit. That is, if one carried a permit to carry a gun, he no longer needed to acquire another permit to purchase additional guns. The same was true of those who held a hunting permit. Hunting permits, it should be noted, authorized Germans to carry handguns as well as hunting guns.
Hitler-era gun laws prohibited criminals, the mentally handicapped, those convicted of treason, persons under age 18, vagabonds and gypsies from owning or carrying firearms.
Many are surprised to learn that The German Weapons Law of 1938 didn't ban Jews from gun ownership. While the law didn't specifically ban Jews from owning firearms, they were stripped of their rights to manufacture or otherwise deal in the munitions trade. Jews, you will recall, were not considered citizens under the National Socialists regime.
Ironically, it was Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower who imposed confiscation of firearms in Germany. American soldiers have been faulted for absconding hordes of guns from Germans after the Allied victory and the Russians have been summarily condemned for executing Germans found with guns or bullets in their possession.
Note, also, that The German Weapons Act (German: Waffengesetz) of 1972 is considered one of the most restrictive gun laws imposed by any government and was enacted decades after the demise of Hitler and his Third Reich.
• Godwin's Law
There is a concept called 'Godwin's Law.' It observes that virtually every debate regarding public policy will ultimately degrade to evoking Hitler or Nazis as a means to discredit the opposing view.
Consequently Hitler has been credited with everything from banning God from government schools to outlawing gun ownership. It should be noted that Hitler's rise to power can be attributed to the skillful use of the media rather than violent force.
Furthermore, Hitler was wildly popular in Germany and faced little opposition. He had no need to ban guns among the general population. The threat of armed revolution among the populace was non-existent and violent street crime, typical in today's America, was highly unusual among the orderly and well-behaved German culture.
Unlike most world leaders, Hitler toured the nation in an open vehicle, undeterred by the prospect of being taken out by a crazed gunman. The last American president who did that was John F. Kennedy.
While Hitler's socialist and fascist policies are anathema to liberty-loving republicans, no one can argue with his success at reviving Germany's post-war economy. It is, therefore, foolish to make untrue attributions to Hitler, or anyone, for that matter. Misquoted history will eventually be discredited.
The problem is we don't read history, we read about history. There is often a significant difference between the two.
For the record, I am adamantly opposed to socialism and it's evil fraternal twin, fascism. However, history is what it is and intentionally distorting it to makes one's case is not only immoral but ill-advised.
Advocates of Second Amendment rights should be careful not to exaggerate Hitler's gun laws. Such exaggeration will ultimately lead to a loss of credibility. Rather, we should 'stick to our guns' and base our argument on the veracity of the United States Constitution.
Please report errors
Like this story?
Help Kenn spread the word by clicking it onto Facebook. See icon below . . .
Permission is granted to use the material in this article providing (1) the byline is included in an obvious manner crediting DailyKenn.com as the author, (2) a link to this page is included and (3) no changes are made either by deletion, addition or annotation. Original compositions at DailyKenn.com are sometimes seeded with decoy data, such as hidden acronyms, to detect unauthorized use and plagiarism.
COMMENTS: The use of vulgarities and pejoratives may result in your comment being zapped. -->